Data for the two O3 pollution cases over OKC on 20210615 & 20240807 outputs; outputs2;
model configuration, WRF–Chem simulation namelists;
post-Processing NCL and Python scripts;
Fig. 01 DomainConfig+SO2 plumes NCL
Fig. 02 NOAA daily Weather map source
Fig. 03 Large-scale temperature condition NCL
Fig. 04 TS of O3 combine NCL
Fig. 05 TS combined NCL
Fig. 06 mesonet wind vectors VS sim combine 2 times NCL
Fig. 07 TROPOMI XNO2 comparison combined python
Fig. 08 emission O3 difference combined NCL
Fig. 09 T2 TS evaluation using mesonet NCL
Fig. 10 TS O3 combine 2 sites NCL
Fig. 11 cross-section O3 NCL
Fig. 12 process analysis O3 NCL
Fig. 13 TS O3diff combine 2 NCL
Fig. 14 O3profi combine 2 NCL
Fig. 15 O3 profile vs obs NCL
Fig. 16 Meteo profile vs obs NCL
Fig. 17 compound heat O3 Aug7 2024 NCL
click previous and next below to browse forward and backward. You can also change different yr mo day hr, then click View Plot All , followed by previous and next

Simulations
Simulations
WRF Version
PBL scheme
Initiation Time
yr:
mo:
hr:
Focus:
Domain:
Sites:
Variables:










 

University of Oklahoma, CAPS
Xiaoming Hu
Comments?




 

University of Oklahoma, CAPS
Xiaoming Hu
Comments?




 

University of Oklahoma, CAPS
Xiaoming Hu
Comments?

 

University of Oklahoma, CAPS
Xiaoming Hu
Comments?


Hu, X.-M., Xue, M., Kong, F., & Zhang, H. (2019), Meteorological Conditions during an Ozone Episode in Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas and Impact of their Modeling Uncertainties on Air Quality Prediction. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmospheres , doi:10.1029/2018JD029791
Fig. 1 Track and O3
Fig. 2 Time series of O3 & T
Fig. 3: Domain Config &sites StageIV average 26-27 Aug 2011 ; old HGT
Fig. 4geoHeight_950
Fig. 5Weather map
Fig. 6MADIS wind vectors
Fig.7 simulated convergence
Fig.8Simulated CO, O3
Fig.9 O3 process analysis
Fig.10 O3 TS 2 episodes
Fig. 11Vertical profiles
Fig. 12control .vs. no_mp_heating meteo
Fig. 13control .vs. no_mp_heating chem
Fig. 14control .vs. lowerSST
Fig.15spatial ensemble
Fig. 16 : TS ensemble ensemble mean vs. control; (old spread)
Fig. 17 probability
Fig. 18Location ensemble
Fig_resubmitted; Fig_R1

TransportCondition_anO3episode_xhu1
Case2011Aug25_28 relevant info
Case2011July5_7

Meteorological and emission drivers of compound heat and ozone pollution episodes in Oklahoma City (Media report: air quality impact of data centers)
Fig. 1 DomainConfig+SO2 plumes; pdf ; NCL
Fig. 2 NOAA daily Weather map source
Fig. 3 Large-scale temperature condition pdf (16 hr later pdf) NCL
Fig. 4 TS of O3 combine ; pdf ; (TS of O3 Eagle; OKC) NCL
Fig. 5 TS combined; NCL; (TS of T2 at 6 mesonet sites; TS of winds at 6 mesonet sites); NCL
Fig. 6 mesonet wind vectors VS sim combine 2 times , pdf , mesonet wind vectors VS sim , ( mesonet wind vectors only) NCL
Fig. 7 TROPOMI XNO2 comparison combined ; XNO2 comparison ; XNO2 comparison ; XNO2 comparison python
Fig. 8 combined; E_NO spatial NCL
Fig. 9 T2 TS evaluation using mesonet ; NCL NCL
Fig. 10 TS O3 combine 2 sites ; (TS O3 ; TS O3 ) NCL
Fig. 11 new cross-section O3 ; NCL ; NCL NCL
Fig. 12 new process analysis O3 NCL
Fig. 13 TS O3diff combine 2 ; (TS O3diff ; TS O3diff ) NCL
Fig. 14 O3profi combine 2 ; (O3profi ; O3profile) NCL
Fig. 15 O3 profile vs obs ; NCL NCL
Fig. 16 Meteo profile vs obs ; FWD NCL
Fig. 17 new compound heat O3 Aug7 2024 NCL

BL and Air quality CAPS poster
BL and Air quality CAPS poster ppt


Hu, X.-M., and M. Xue (2016), Influence of Synoptic Sea Breeze Fronts on the Urban Heat Island Intensity in Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas, MWR, DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-15-0201.1
Fig. 1 domain config
Fig. 2 TS UHII
Fig. 3 TS Aug5-11
Fig. 4 simulated spatial
Fig. 5 sim spatial 2200
Fig. 6 Front penetration
Fig. 7 (old no budget) sim tendency spatial
Fig. 8 obs tendency spatial
Fig. 9 Cross wind&pertub
Fig. 10 profiles
Fig. 11 Cross QCLOUD
Fig. 12 Cross tendency
Fig. 13 UHI spatial
Fig. 14 Vertical profiles
Fig. 15 Simulated TS UHII
Fig. combine xhu1

Vertical resolution:
(0) 0.01250047; (1) 0.03752986; (2) 0.06261035; (3) 0.08773514; (4) 0.1129048; (5) 0.1465427; (6) 0.1886918; (7) 0.2309755; (8) 0.2947139; (9) 0.3801246; (10) 0.4661095; (11) 0.5526763; (12) 0.639833; (13) 0.7275862; (14) 0.838226; (15) 0.9721615; (16) 1.107536; (17) 1.244387; (18) 1.429561; (19) 1.664522; (20) 1.904019; (21) 2.148325; (22) 2.423327; (23) 2.730919; (24) 3.04765; (25) 3.374014; (26) 3.710458; (27) 4.057816; (28) 4.417; (29) 4.788879; (30) 5.208094; (31) 5.679298; (32) 6.17458; (33) 6.697193; (34) 7.292512; (35) 7.970034; (36) 8.699677; (37) 9.49173; (38) 10.30089; (39) 11.06765; (40) 11.84452; (41) 12.62186; (42) 13.40093; (43) 14.16873; (44) 14.93182; (45) 15.67545; (46) 16.2665

http://www.micromet.psu.edu/datatransfer/Jennipaper.html
observation at TCEQ site Ft. Worth Northwest C13/AH302 for Wednesday, September 20-21, 2011

----------------
airborne organisms reveal sea breeze
Boundary layer processes TX; P; Concise;